Sir Hiss And Synchronized.

So, to start it off i joined the server and were ready to have some fun with derping around, when Sir Hiss and Synchronized started to be hostile towards me, It ended off with a lot of slapping and "Naughty Darkregen" sort of stuff, basicly they were picking on me, and ruining my evening.

All the evidence i have are these pictures.

http://files.f-o-g.eu/fa846b
http://files.f-o-g.eu/0acfac
http://files.f-o-g.eu/7e1d00
http://files.f-o-g.eu/31aa4c
http://files.f-o-g.eu/ed8f2d
http://files.f-o-g.eu/941583
http://files.f-o-g.eu/3ebabf
http://files.f-o-g.eu/dcf8cf
http://files.f-o-g.eu/6c1937
http://files.f-o-g.eu/2f5623

 

That´s just abusive, hiss keeps slaying people and threaten them for no reason..

 

Ow. That sounds painful.

 

seems like they were having fun, Did you ask them to stop?
this can be tagged as abuse, but what you did before it was kind of insulting.

 

I didnt bother asking them to stop, because i knew they wouldnt.

And what do you mean by what i did before?

 

This is straight up abuse, unless there is any backstory involved.

 

Well, I wasn't me who slapped you. And all I said about that abusing stuff was just the truth.
Or do you really want to tell me that you never killed, healed, or destroyed anything with Buddha mode you got from an Admin.
Even Coffee and Meow said that, that you are abusing your donator benefits. As far as I know they posted this on your previous Admin Application too.
I am sorry if this offended you. I also wanted to give you buddha in the end but you instantly declined that...

 

started reading mid conversation about you telling him he was the new arbiter,
Still wish there was a console log :/

 

Im not denying it, and the "abuse" meow and coffee is talking about is about unwritten rules, like i didnt know at that time that throwing jarate at people while i had buddha were against the rules, where Meow said that it were "common sense".

 

From what I understand: Sir Hiss was NOT the one who abused slap on DarkRegen, but DarkRegen is not innocent as he has abused his donator abilities and supposedly buddha mode.
Regarding the jarate during buddha, as it was told to be 'common sense', people often throw jarate at other people to either annoy them/joke/boredome. Would make sense that it can be confusing.

Either way, I think it'd be best if we all laid down the gunfire and just moved on with an apology here and there.

 

I'm sorry but, I don't know how you can abuse Donor Abilities, the only thing I can think of him going really small and killing people but seeing as there is no evidence I don't see who's to blame in this case, like Jozzeh said, let's just lay the gunfire down.

 

Abuse of donator benefits doesn't exist. If they pay for it, they can use it. It's not like admin commands which are earnt. You don't pay for an all-crit weapon and then be told you can't kill anyone with it. Using that logic, using donor powers to kill seems fine. Going small = no damage, and going big = bullet magnet, so that is not a valid argument.

Again, I don't know if the donor stuff differs between servers. If it does, correct me.

 

This would make sense and surely clear things up actually.

 

As I know, only trade and achievement/idle got the resize feature, as they dont have any gameplay purpose.

 

Therefore, it would make next to no sense to punish a donator for using a feature that they were granted.

You don't give a kid a rifle and then scold him because he fired it.

 

The only time I would see something abusive that has something to do with Donators is their donator weapons, mainly on Trade, where they are sometimes unfair, but from this point of view Donor Abuse doesn't really exist as Sam stated.

Edit: Also Sam I think on Achievement there is a feature to go small and do the same amount of damage, correct me if I'm wrong.

 

You are Rights Curry.

I agree with Jozzeh, lets stop the gunfire and apologize

 

Last time I checked achievement/idle didn't have the damage-scales-with-size variable enabled due to certain people being lazy. Could've changed in the mean time though.

 

this looks a lot like middle school bullying

 

Aha, I see. Doesn't affect my argument however.