Rejected Sawbeast and Bacon Drink map glitching

Doesn't change the fact that you map glitched.

 

As I said I didn´t do it on purpose and many others did too. Also I am still sorry.

 

Last chance, it means you don't get any more chances.

 

Why are you actually reporting me after 1000+ People did it the last months before I did it the first time?
Kinda suspicious.

 

You were warned and I witnessed you do it.

Also, you're a dick to a lot of people, including, but not limited to, me and Starfish.

 

Oh I am such a dick I have to tell you Starfish used the glitch many times before us. Oh and no, you were the dick to me, thats how it all started.

 

Bacon i'm not going to repeat myself but please read these words carefully :

IF YOU SEE SOMEONE EXPLOITING MAP BUGS/GLITCHES OR BREAKING RULES REPORT THEM YOUR WORD DOES NOT COUNT ONLY PICTURES/DEMOS COUNT AS PROOF

Get it?

 

I report people for breaking the rules but SINCE I DIDNT KNOW IT WAS AN EXPLOIT I DIDN´T REPORT ANYONE FOR USING IT.
Get it ?

 

Yup i get it, but considering you didn't know it was an exploit i have to take you're too stupid to read the rules/understand them

 

I already said so many time why I thought that and yeah it was stupid I agree with that .

 

Bacon, I'm not gonna repeat myself either.

IF IT WASN'T MEANT TO HAPPEN, BUT YOU DO IT ANYWAY, IT'S AN EXPLOIT.

Also, everyone please stop replying to this thread, we need the final verdict.

^ Notable post.

 

Mate, I would like to remind you, that you most likely have been there too. I have been there.... (I discovered it) we have warned them now close it.

 

It's the fact that he's on his last warning and you guys keep giving him warnings sure that is going to work (NOT).

 

AND you do not understand that post. The issue was he had two accounts and he thought the time was up when on the wrong account and got a 4month one and I had to get him unbanned, this was an issue as he shouldn't be using two. He has now stopped and that part was fine. The descision was made to warn him not ban him. EVEN if they HAVE BEEN BANNED. You STILL WARN THEM. If it was the opposite way around and it was you. YOU WOULD WANT TO BE WARNED AND NOT BANNED STRAIGHT AWAY. ESPECIALLY AS NO ONE HAS CARED FOR THAT SPOT. The spot in question can be reached by anyone easily, it is just a jump you need to get right, similarly one by the trampoline which only requires the correct jump and so they probably didn't even think it was that bad.

"All bans are at the discretion of the administrators, whether they do or do not conform to the rules listed." He obviously thought a warning was best and It does not matter what the rules stated, it was his OPINION. I know you have a grudge against him. But I swear you have been on the one ontop of the trampoline and thus your a hypocrite.

EDIT: Just going to quote downie "We would rather sort it out through communication rather than banning them" Dark obviously wanted to sort it out that way. THERE IS NOTHING LEFT. The admin who handled it thought it should be sorted peacefully. Not every wrong deserves a ban. And why focus on him. SAWBEAST and BACON was reported. Only Tomas wants bacon banned. This shows it is more of a personal grudge than a solid report....

CLOSE IT.

 

Oh so i'm a hypocrite now for stating facts?Nice 1 m8.
I'd have to let you know, if you make up rules and do not hold them yourself, then i do not know why you even have rules,it really doesn't surprise me what has happend and will happen if you deal with rule breakers like this.

Do i have a grudge against Bacon? Yes,probably - because it seems like,no matter what rule he breaks ya'll just give warnings,what's up with that m8.

And yes,i will keep posting the same stuff over and over again in hope one day you'll learn it.

 

Mate. I was talking about tomas. Must have quoted me rather than him.

" because it seems like,no matter what rule he breaks ya'll just give warning" AFTER EVERY BAN EXPIRED, I like to believe that we have started over. I then treat them like any other player and warn them before banning, just cuz he broke a rule and got banned, does not mean he should still not be warned. He is given the same treatment I would give any one else I have banned. I like giving people chances, yes. Bacon has not used that exploit since. Showing it HAS WORKED and he KNOWS he did something WRONG.

 

Not trying to be a dick here but: I know you have a grudge against him. But I swear you have been on the one ontop of the trampoline and thus your a hypocrite.
Anyone else could easily say that you try to defend anyone that you have a 'connection' with even though they've blatantly broken rules, also it's bloody obvious he had intentions to abuse map glitches.

 

Spartan, what do we do with aimbotters, hackers and exploiters?
We ban them for breaking a strong rule.

We don't give aimbotters a second chance, do we?
(I sure hope not.)

Sawbeast and BaconDrink both broke a strong rule.

I found this from Bacon Drink's chatlogs.
As you can see; Bacon insulted Tomas and Donald when they weren't on the server which is uneccesary, since he's causing more trouble.

 

I have been up there once when it was a freeday and I wanted to try on a class without double jump. The one over the fence I DID say I used, and no one cared it was a joke. But it is not about me, this is about Tomas' report on bacon. And anyway, how did they have an intent to abuse it, when really it can't be abused? Yes you can get outside the map. But everyone can get there? Can't really abuse it. And ontop of that, don't bring connections into this, he actually dislikes me. If you recall this is just my characteristics. I give second chances and I constantly warn around 3/4 times per rule broken to make sure they have gotten the message before banning them unless IT IS A BIG THING that was broken, I.E hacking.

Well they are talking about the truth they hate them, and where else do you talk if not in game? Maybe it isn't nice but it is not breaking any rules there. This is literally useless, they have been dealt with, I do not question any of your choices unless they have made an appeal so do not question dark's. Dark dealt with them but tomas wants a ban. HE is trying to get them banned as he has a grudge. This is all pathetic as it is already DEALT WITH.

 

Judging from past player reports it's pretty obvious you will try to defend people that you have a connection with, even though it's clear they have broke rules, also look at Tacos post, Bacon called Tomas a prick, this is against the rules, if you are going to defend him, at least tell him not to go slandering people behind their backs.